DECISION ENGINE / MODELS

Choose with
the evidence open.

Put quality, cost, capabilities, deployment, and control in the same field of view. Select up to four models and keep the exact decision set in the URL.

COMPARISON SET

Select two to four models.

Selection is stored in the URL so this exact comparison can be bookmarked or shared.

DECISION FACTORKimi K3Moonshot AINorth Mini CodeCohere
QUALITY EVIDENCE
Intelligence Index5727.6
Coding Agent IndexNOT RECORDED33.4%
GDPval-AA v21668 Elo21.7 Elo
Output speedNOT RECORDED199 tok/s
COST + SCALE
Input / 1M tokensNOT RECORDEDNOT RECORDED
Output / 1M tokensNOT RECORDEDNOT RECORDED
Context windowNot disclosedNot disclosed
AccessOpen weightsOpen weights
CAPABILITIES
ReasoningYESNO
Vision inputYESNO
Tool callingYESYES
Structured outputYESYES
Fine-tuning pathYESYES
Self-hostingYESYES
DEPLOYMENT
HostingOpen weights / hosted APIsOpen weights
Privacy postureSelf-host or provider APISelf-hostable
Strongest fitOpen deployment · Agentic workflows · Knowledge workSmall coding systems · Self-hosting · Fast inference
READ BEFORE CHOOSING

Benchmark values are evaluation-specific snapshots, not universal quality scores. Prices can change and long-context or tool use may add fees. Validate provider documentation and run your own workload before production commitment.

PERMANENT COMPARISON GUIDES

Common decisions,
already framed.

01

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Compare two proprietary frontier systems across intelligence, coding, price, speed, deployment, and professional fit.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
02

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3

Compare a proprietary coding leader with a frontier-adjacent open-weight alternative.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
03

Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3

Compare leading proprietary intelligence with open-weight control and deployment flexibility.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
04

Kimi K3 vs North Mini Code

Compare two open-weight options optimized for very different quality, scale, and speed requirements.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗