DECISION ENGINE / MODELS

Choose with
the evidence open.

Put quality, cost, capabilities, deployment, and control in the same field of view. Select up to four models and keep the exact decision set in the URL.

COMPARISON SET

Select two to four models.

Selection is stored in the URL so this exact comparison can be bookmarked or shared.

DECISION FACTORClaude Opus 5AnthropicKimi K3Moonshot AI
QUALITY EVIDENCE
Intelligence Index6157
Coding Agent IndexNOT RECORDEDNOT RECORDED
GDPval-AA v21861 Elo1668 Elo
Output speed55.7 tok/sNOT RECORDED
COST + SCALE
Input / 1M tokens$5NOT RECORDED
Output / 1M tokens$25NOT RECORDED
Context window1MNot disclosed
AccessProprietaryOpen weights
CAPABILITIES
ReasoningYESYES
Vision inputYESYES
Tool callingYESYES
Structured outputYESYES
Fine-tuning pathNOYES
Self-hostingNOYES
DEPLOYMENT
HostingAnthropic API / cloud partnersOpen weights / hosted APIs
Privacy postureProvider API; enterprise controlsSelf-host or provider API
Strongest fitAgentic knowledge work · Complex reasoning · Professional deliverablesOpen deployment · Agentic workflows · Knowledge work
READ BEFORE CHOOSING

Benchmark values are evaluation-specific snapshots, not universal quality scores. Prices can change and long-context or tool use may add fees. Validate provider documentation and run your own workload before production commitment.

PERMANENT COMPARISON GUIDES

Common decisions,
already framed.

01

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Compare two proprietary frontier systems across intelligence, coding, price, speed, deployment, and professional fit.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
02

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3

Compare a proprietary coding leader with a frontier-adjacent open-weight alternative.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
03

Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3

Compare leading proprietary intelligence with open-weight control and deployment flexibility.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
04

Kimi K3 vs North Mini Code

Compare two open-weight options optimized for very different quality, scale, and speed requirements.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗