DECISION ENGINE / MODELS

Choose with
the evidence open.

Put quality, cost, capabilities, deployment, and control in the same field of view. Select up to four models and keep the exact decision set in the URL.

COMPARISON SET

Select two to four models.

Selection is stored in the URL so this exact comparison can be bookmarked or shared.

DECISION FACTORClaude Opus 5AnthropicGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
QUALITY EVIDENCE
Intelligence Index6159
Coding Agent IndexNOT RECORDED80%
GDPval-AA v21861 EloNOT RECORDED
Output speed55.7 tok/s60 tok/s
COST + SCALE
Input / 1M tokens$5$5
Output / 1M tokens$25$30
Context window1M1M
AccessProprietaryProprietary
CAPABILITIES
ReasoningYESYES
Vision inputYESYES
Tool callingYESYES
Structured outputYESYES
Fine-tuning pathNONO
Self-hostingNONO
DEPLOYMENT
HostingAnthropic API / cloud partnersOpenAI Responses API
Privacy postureProvider API; enterprise controlsZero Data Retention eligible
Strongest fitAgentic knowledge work · Complex reasoning · Professional deliverablesCoding agents · Deep reasoning · Large-context analysis
READ BEFORE CHOOSING

Benchmark values are evaluation-specific snapshots, not universal quality scores. Prices can change and long-context or tool use may add fees. Validate provider documentation and run your own workload before production commitment.

PERMANENT COMPARISON GUIDES

Common decisions,
already framed.

01

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Compare two proprietary frontier systems across intelligence, coding, price, speed, deployment, and professional fit.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
02

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K3

Compare a proprietary coding leader with a frontier-adjacent open-weight alternative.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
03

Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3

Compare leading proprietary intelligence with open-weight control and deployment flexibility.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗
04

Kimi K3 vs North Mini Code

Compare two open-weight options optimized for very different quality, scale, and speed requirements.

OPEN COMPARISON ↗